W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1998

Re: Confused about persistent connection for old clients

From: Scott Lawrence <lawrence@agranat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 16:30:13 -0400
Message-Id: <199804162030.QAA09263@devnix.agranat.com>
To: "Windes, Edwin" <ewindes@spyglass.com>
Cc: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/59

>>>>> "EW" ==  <ewindes@spyglass.com> writes:

EW> OK, I too, am confused about why proxies MUST NOT establish
EW> persistent connections with 1.0 clients.  If the client and
EW> origin server connections are handled separately, and if the
EW> proxy understands the 1.0 Keep-alive, what's the danger?

  I believe that the intent is that the proxy server not assume
  1.1-style persistent connections.  The prohibition does not apply to
  the non-standard Keep-Alive mechanism; that is why it is noted in
  the text you quoted:

>> A proxy server MUST NOT establish a persistent connection
>> with an HTTP/1.0 client (but see RFC 2068 for information
>> about the Keep-Alive header implemented by many HTTP/1.0 clients).

Scott Lawrence           EmWeb Embedded Server       <lawrence@agranat.com>
Agranat Systems, Inc.        Engineering            http://www.agranat.com/
Received on Thursday, 16 April 1998 13:36:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:16:30 UTC