- From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 1997 20:31:30 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: kweide@tezcat.com
- Cc: dwm@xpasc.com, montulli@netscape.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Klaus Weide: > [...] >The message where I proposed what is summarized above is at ><URL: http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/hypermail/1997q3/0402.html>. >(For some reason it doesn't show up immediately when one follows the >links into the archive from the Issues Page.) There were several replies >that indicated agreement. > >If the people present in Munich came to a different consensus, I would >very much like to know why. Being one of the people in Munich, I can report that we had no good reasons to prefer swapping over allocating a new code, it is just that we preferred swapping slightly more. I also recall that we thought that swapping was the solution most often mentioned on the mailing list. I do not think it is useful to spend too much time arguing which of the two is the better solution, we need to pick one and move on. Klaus, please tell us whether you can live with the spec using the swapping solution. If you think that swapping is evil, we can try to get consensus on the 307 solution. I for one can live with both solutions, and I think this is true for all people I discussed it with in Munich. > Klaus Koen.
Received on Friday, 29 August 1997 11:36:50 UTC