- From: Dave Kristol <dmk@bell-labs.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Mar 1997 15:48:56 -0500
- To: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>, "'hedlund@best.com'" <hedlund@best.com>
- Cc: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
At 1:39 AM -0800 3/22/97, Yaron Goland wrote: >Cool. David, what do you think? We define PORT. If it is included then >the cookie may only be returned on the port it is received. If it is not >included then the cookie may be returned on any port within the domain. Sounds reasonable to me. At the risk of complexifying things, should Port perhaps take a comma-separated list of ports to which the cookie can be sent, rather than just to the port from which it came? That would provide a middle ground between one port and all. Dave Kristol
Received on Saturday, 22 March 1997 12:53:52 UTC