W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1996

Re: HTTP response version, again

From: Bob Jernigan <jern@spaceaix.jhuapl.edu>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 12:00:50 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <9612301700.AA19836@sdrmis.jhuapl.edu>
To: abigail@ny.fnx.com
Cc: swingard@spyglass.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/2190
> In my opinion, the server should not include HTTP/1.1 headers which are
> not part of HTTP/1.0 when responding to a HTTP/1.0 request, and label
> the response as being HTTP/1.0.
> Abigail
It's not the response that being labeled by the HTTP/1.1 header, it's
the server's capability.  There would be no reason to send an HTTP
header if it only had to match the client's request.

Received on Monday, 30 December 1996 09:05:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:16:21 UTC