W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1996

Re: Hit-metering: to Proposed Standard?

From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 00:01:24 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <199611192301.AAA18813@wsooti04.win.tue.nl>
To: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1911
Jeffrey Mogul:
>Several weeks ago, Paul Leach and I submitted an Internet-Draft
>on "Simple Hit-Metering for HTTP":
> ftp://ds.internic.net/internet-drafts/draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-00.txt
>and announced it to the HTTP-WG mailing list.
>Since we have not seen any criticism of our latest proposal, we would
>like to interpret this as lack of criticism rather than lack of

Oops.  I have not yet reviewed your draft, but I plan to do so before
December.  I will not bore you with explanations of my slowness.

Note that I had some problems with the previous draft; I have no idea
yet whether they were resolved in this one.

I would interpret the lack of criticism so far as a lack of time, and
as a sign that most WG members are using `shortest job first'
scheduling.  Based on this, I feel that you need to wait at least
until after the December IETF before submitting as a proposed

I believe that those people who have not read the draft before the
December IETF will more or less by default place themselves outside of
the `community' which works on completing the `community review'
required for a proposed standard.  Note that Larry may disagree.  Of
course, if the reviewing community is small, you will have to come
with some convincing evidence that there is enough community interest.

>-Jeff and Paul

Received on Tuesday, 19 November 1996 15:12:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:16:21 UTC