- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 14:16:56 PDT
- To: dan@spyglass.com
- Cc: luotonen@netscape.com, ben@algroup.co.uk, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
> Larry, it would seem a slight rewording of the warning Note: would be > appropriate given the wording of the definition of semantic transparancy. We're not going to change the HTTP/1.1 RFC at this point: it's important to let it progress, with the understanding that it's a Proposed Standard. I'm not really worried about jeopardizing the 'Draft Standard' status of a revision, either. The main concern I have is that we keep a complete and coherent list of editorial revisions. The mailing list archive isn't sufficient, since the traffic level is high. I'm soliciting for a donation of 'forum' space on someone's distributed web collaboration tool that would let us maintain this. Any donors? Larry
Received on Thursday, 17 October 1996 14:20:42 UTC