W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1996

Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-00.txt

From: Foteos Macrides <MACRIDES@sci.wfbr.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 18:55:03 -0500 (EST)
To: gtn@ebt.com
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1758
gtn@ebt.com (Gavin Nicol) wrote:
>>In other words, i18n has nothing to do with it.
>I think I18N has everything to do with the choice of using message
>bodies or not.

	Hmm.  Here's some more quibbling about individual words in our
email communications.  The "nothing" and "everything" in those two
sentences make both of them hyperbole.  :) :)

	Reason b) in the Safe ID does need a tweak in its wording, and
perhaps some reasons c) and d) need to be added for why POST often is
used despite the Request-URI-plus-subordinate-content being safe.

	But it's otherwise an excellent -00 draft. :) :)
	Thanks Koen!  You made my day!!!!


 Foteos Macrides            Worcester Foundation for Biomedical Research
 MACRIDES@SCI.WFBR.EDU         222 Maple Avenue, Shrewsbury, MA 01545
Received on Thursday, 10 October 1996 16:15:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:16:20 UTC