W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1996

Re: REPOST (was: HTTP working group status & issues)

From: Marc Salomon <marc@ckm.ucsf.edu>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 1996 12:20:30 -0700
Message-Id: <9610081220.ZM10314@gaia.ckm.ucsf.edu>
To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1718
Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com> wrote:
|The proposal changes frequently (Friday it was 'redo-safe', today it
|is 'safe') and it won't be clear what we're asking for consensus on
|until there is an internet draft on which we do Last Call.

I thought this would fit best using the Allow header as follows:

     Allow: POST=resafe, GET, PUT

for a repostable or

     Allow: POST=reunsafe, POST=foo, GET, PUT=bar

for a nonrepostable.


Received on Tuesday, 8 October 1996 12:24:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:16:20 UTC