W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1996

Re: Draft text: The Core Feature Set (Sections 1 - 4)

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 17:28:11 PDT
To: koen@win.tue.nl
Cc: koen@win.tue.nl, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <96Oct5.172811pdt."2757"@golden.parc.xerox.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1701
Well, the problem is that some of the features you're proposing to be
'standards track' are for things that are not themselves standards
track. I think that's gotten us in trouble in the past.

A feature like 'can print color' can be standards track.
A feature like 'implements vendor-B version 2.0 variation of tables'
shouldn't be standards track if vendor-B's version 2.0 variation of
tables isn't.


Received on Saturday, 5 October 1996 17:32:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:16:20 UTC