W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1996

Re: REPOST (was: HTTP working group status & issues)

From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 20:28:55 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <199610051828.UAA05358@wsooti04.win.tue.nl>
To: Foteos Macrides <MACRIDES@sci.wfbr.edu>
Cc: koen@win.tue.nl, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1696
Foteos Macrides:
>  I'm still groping for some name for the
>header which implies a status report on whether such a side effect has

Why would you want such a status report in a header?  If you know that
a redo is safe, you can also store the form you just submitted in a

Received on Saturday, 5 October 1996 11:36:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:16:20 UTC