- From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 22:25:36 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@avron.ICS.UCI.EDU>
- Cc: ddubois@spyglass.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Roy T. Fielding:
>
>Anything in draft 03 which was not subject to open review by the WG
>is subject to complete rewrites -- that is just a fact of life.
>That includes about 80% of caching, persistent connections, and
>negotiation, because the subgroups failed to introduce a complete
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>set of differences to the WG when they were supposed to do so, and thus
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>we are left with the situation of having to make last-minute rewrites
>to the document itself.
For the record, the content negotiation subgroup _did_ produce a
complete set of differences in February. The reason why the work of
the content negotiation subgroup did not get merged into the 03 draft
is an entirely different one: the negotiation stuff has not yet been
fully reviewed by the whole wg because all work on negotiation was
pre-empted by work on caching.
> ...Roy T. Fielding
Koen.
Received on Thursday, 16 May 1996 13:29:34 UTC