RE: Drafting mux WG charter from Jim Whitehead on 1999-02-09 (ietf-http-ng@w3.org from February 1999)

From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 12:40:32 -0800
To: Mike Spreitzer <spreitze@parc.xerox.com>, ietf-http-ng@w3.org
Message-ID: <001101be546c$704dca60$d115c380@galileo.ics.uci.edu>

>  I've just posted a new mux WG
> charter draft, at
>
> <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP-NG/1999/02/mux-Charter-209.html>

I'm assuming it's just an oversight, but the timeline doesn't include an
explicit action item for submitting the goals document for approval as an
Informational RFC.  Is the goals document intended to be submitted as an
Informational RFC, or is it a throwaway?

- Jim

Received on Tuesday, 9 February 1999 15:48:08 UTC