- From: Rolf H. Nelson <rnelson@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 12:13:53 -0500
- To: ietf-http-ext@w3.org
draft-frystyk-http-extensions-01 looks solid to me. (Disclaimer: I work for the same company as the editor, but I did try to be as unbiased as possible.) Even after rereading the spec multiple times, I was unable to determine whether decl-extensions from Section 3 are specific to individual extensions, or whether they are global to the HTTP extension framework. "An extension declaration can be extended through the use of one or more decl-ext parameters" seems ambiguous, and in fact I originally thought this meant that each extension could make up its own decl-ext parameters, so that Rolf-Extension: foo could legally become Opt: "http://www.rolf.com/myextension"; ns=14-; myvalue=foo If my Rolf Extension (TM) permitted such a thing. In other words, myvalue is interpreted by the Rolf Extension handler, rather than by the HTTP Extension Framework. It is only after looking at the issues list that I see the intent of the specification is the reverse. Otherwise this looks good, I would support this for a recommendation even if no changes get made to reflect my above concern. -Rolf -- | Rolf Nelson (rolf@w3.org), Project Manager, W3C at MIT | "Try to learn something about everything | and everything about something." --Huxley
Received on Friday, 15 January 1999 12:14:46 UTC