- From: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 13:54:08 -0800
- To: "'Scott Lawrence'" <lawrence@agranat.com>
- Cc: ietf-http-ext@w3.org
> ---------- > From: Scott Lawrence[SMTP:lawrence@agranat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 1998 12:43 PM > To: Paul Leach > Cc: ietf-http-ext@w3.org > Subject: Re: First reactions to mandatory draft > > > SL> I think that having different URLs to identify the extentions is > SL> sufficient; if the extentions are so incompatible that they cannot > SL> be used in the same header syntax unambiguously, then they shouldn't > SL> be implemented in the same place anyway. > > >>>>> "PL" == Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com> writes: > > PL> What? First, if two groups invented the extension independently, > PL> there will almost certainly be _no_ relation between them. Second, > PL> if there's just a URL, how can you tell which headers go with that > PL> URL? > > If I don't understand the extention it doesn't matter whether or not > I know what headers go with it - I return an error anyway. > What if you understand both of them? Paul
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 1998 16:54:31 UTC