W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-ext@w3.org > April to June 1998

Re: Last call on mandatory issues

From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 18:49:20 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <199805221649.SAA00371@wsooti08.win.tue.nl>
To: joshco@microsoft.com (Josh Cohen)
Cc: ietf-http-ext@w3.org
Josh Cohen:
>
[...]
>Please review and comment.
>
>1) Concensus was that the current working in Mandatory is correct. A
>solution to the discussion was proposed to a) take out the current wording
>in Mandatory and leave it "as defined in HTTP" and b) do one of the
>following in order of preference:
>
>     -	Make a plea to Larry and Jim that the notion of end-to-end
>	is clarified in HTTP/1.1 spec as currently stated in Mandatory
>     - Make a note in the (now yet written) extension guide lines
>	discussing the floating notion of end-to-end.
>
>Action: Henrik to talk to Larry and Jim.
>Status: Ready for last call on mailing list

I would prefer a solution in which you use a new term like
agent-to-agent extension.  I think that using 'end' for something
which is in the middle is just too confusing.  Don't clarify broken
terminology: just stop using it.

Koen.
Received on Friday, 22 May 1998 12:49:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 1 July 2021 15:49:08 UTC