Re: "end-to-end" headers in HTTP/1.1 [was Re: Mandatory]

On Sat, 18 Apr 1998, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:
 
> - everything else which we often call end-to-end. 

I continue to disagree with the notion that we (the HTTP-WG community) use
'end-to-end' to refer to 'everything else'. There will be much less
confusion of the 'mandatory' specification uses a different term.

Dave Morris

Received on Friday, 17 April 1998 13:40:34 UTC