W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-ext@w3.org > April to June 1998

Re: comments on draft-ietf-http-ext-mandatory-00.txt

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1998 18:08:14 +0900
Message-Id: <>
To: koen@win.tue.nl (Koen Holtman)
Cc: ietf-http-ext@w3.org
At 20:28 3/26/98 +0100, Koen Holtman wrote:

>I just realised that you also may want to forbid man: headers in 304
>responses altogether as they may overwrite an already-existing man
>header in the cached entry.

But 304 already SHOULD NOT contain any new header fields - exactly for the
sake of consistency. Why is this different for Man than for any other header?

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen,
World Wide Web Consortium
Received on Saturday, 11 April 1998 04:40:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 1 July 2021 15:49:08 UTC