W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-ext@w3.org > April to June 1998

Re: comments on draft-ietf-http-ext-mandatory-00.txt

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1998 18:08:14 +0900
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980411180814.008aac00@localhost>
To: koen@win.tue.nl (Koen Holtman)
Cc: ietf-http-ext@w3.org
At 20:28 3/26/98 +0100, Koen Holtman wrote:

>I just realised that you also may want to forbid man: headers in 304
>responses altogether as they may overwrite an already-existing man
>header in the cached entry.

But 304 already SHOULD NOT contain any new header fields - exactly for the
sake of consistency. Why is this different for Man than for any other header?

Henrik
--
Henrik Frystyk Nielsen,
World Wide Web Consortium
http://www.w3.org/People/Frystyk
Received on Saturday, 11 April 1998 04:40:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 1 July 2021 15:49:08 UTC