- From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
- Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 21:57:11 -0500
- To: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>
- cc: Patrik Faltstrom <paf@cisco.com>, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian@hursley.ibm.com>, "Carl Ford" <carl@ietfwatch.net>, discuss@apps.ietf.org
> So, perhaps the wording should be something like "unless expressly designed, > IETF protocols are only guaranteed without NATs". for that matter, you can leave off IETF - it's true for IP protocols in general
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2002 22:01:30 UTC