- From: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 21:39:47 +0100
- To: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>
- Cc: Carl Ford <carl@ietfwatch.net>, discuss@apps.ietf.org
On tisdag, dec 3, 2002, at 13:18 Europe/Stockholm, Brian E Carpenter
wrote:
> IMHO, the IETF community's job should be to make applications that
> run better with a good supply of addresses and without NAT. Beyond
> that we get into economic or regulatory questions, where the IETF
> can't play.
>
Well said Brian. I think this is what we should say in this document I
would like to have. That we in the IETF _only_ guarantee functionality
for our protocols where NAT does _not_ exist.
paf
Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2002 15:40:51 UTC