- From: John Angelmo <john@veidit.net>
- Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 22:13:30 +0100
- To: Carl Ford <carl@ietfwatch.net>
- CC: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, discuss@apps.ietf.org
Carl Ford wrote: > One aspect of this to be discussed is the ease of use of getting the IP > addresses. Nats have a simple plug and play value that is a counter-balance > to getting IP addresses allocated. Particularly when most folks have used the > ISP for this function. > Well the NAT problem gets bigger and bigger every day. I think the race on IPv4 is lost here, it's better to concentrare on IPv6 and have good IP rules that every user gets a big net and good documentation from the ISP on how to use it. Things must be easy for the end user and SMB otherwise we are stuck in a new NAT swamp. /John
Received on Monday, 2 December 2002 16:14:13 UTC