- From: Simon Lyall <simon@darkmere.gen.nz>
- Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 08:48:27 +1300 (NZDT)
- To: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
- cc: "Clive D.W. Feather" <clive@demon.net>, <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Tony Hansen wrote: > Clive D.W. Feather wrote: > > Why /24, for goodness sake? Surely /64 is big enough for any organisation > > that's going to be connecting through this kind of ISP? > > Pick a number. At this time, it's an academic point. People have picked numbers, and one of them is a minimum /48 for end users (ie home dialup). See RFC 3177 also: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ipv6policy.html http://www.arin.net/policy/ipv6_policy.html I'm not sure this discussion is entirely on topic for this list. -- Simon J. Lyall. | Very Busy | Mail: simon@darkmere.gen.nz "To stay awake all night adds a day to your life" - Stilgar | eMT.
Received on Monday, 2 December 2002 14:49:57 UTC