- From: Clive D.W. Feather <clive@demon.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 17:12:05 +0000
- To: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
- Cc: discuss@apps.ietf.org
Tony Hansen said: > The major problem I see is the desire of ISPs to only allow one IP > address to be grabbed per connection to the ISP. [...] > As long as ISPs continue to work under this pretext, it won't matter if > they're handing out IPv4 #'s or IPv6 #'s -- they'll still only want to > hand out a single IP address, and people are going to continue to use > NAT in some form to get around the problem. > > I think we need some incentive for them to hand out IPv6 addresses in > chunks of /24 or larger. I don't know what such an incentive would be. Why /24, for goodness sake? Surely /64 is big enough for any organisation that's going to be connecting through this kind of ISP? -- Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <clive@demon.net> | Tel: +44 20 8371 1138 Internet Expert | Home: <clive@davros.org> | Fax: +44 870 051 9937 Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646 Thus plc | |
Received on Monday, 2 December 2002 12:14:33 UTC