Re: Requirements for reliable message delivery

> > I'm wondering if people have had a chance to look at this draft.
> > It describes a gap that probably needs filling.

> The instance on HTTP is bogus. A much better starting point for this would be
      xxxxxxxx^insistance

> APEX, which already meets most of the requirements given here and could easily
> be extended to meet the remainder.

> The assessment given of BEEP is also bogus, since BEEP is a protocol framework,
> not an application protocol per se.

> 				Ned

Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2001 13:16:36 UTC