- From: Jacob Palme <jpalme@dsv.su.se>
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 11:54:22 +0200
- To: IETF Applications Area general discussion list <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
At 18.08 -0400 01-05-06, Keith Moore wrote: >please explain to me how an existing UA will fare any better when >presented with multipart/choices than it fares when presented >with multipart/alternative. Suppose a message contains three body parts, containing the same text in German, English and French. Suppose the English text is the original, the other are not-very good machine translations. Multipart/choices will work like multipart/mixed for MUAs which do not support multipart/choices. This means that all three parts are delivered to the user, and the user can choose which part to read. If the parts are given suitable file names using Content-Disposition, for example "German-machine-translation", "English-original", "French- machine-translation" most MUAs will show these file names and thus help the users choose which attachment to read. Some MUAs show the first body part of multipart/mixed, and treat the others as attachments. It might be better in such a case to add an almost empty body part first which just says that the other parts contain the same info in multiple languages. This, as well as how to provide translation of the Subject, are issues which might be discussed if IETF starts work on this issue. (If IETF wants to start work on this, I have already started a mailing list which can be used, LANGTRANS@psychmax.psychology.su.se, use Listserv conventions to subscribe. Archives at http://salut.nu/forum/uno/6/1/.) Multipart/alternative will mean that users of many existing MUAs will be shown only one of the body parts, usually either the first or the third. A user who prefers to read the message in the language used in any of the other body parts will not even be told that there are other language versions. It is obviously better to give a recipient a choice of translations to different languages, than to give the user only one single translation, which is not adapted to the language preferences of the user. -- Jacob Palme <jpalme@dsv.su.se> (Stockholm University and KTH) for more info see URL: http://www.dsv.su.se/jpalme/
Received on Monday, 7 May 2001 07:27:08 UTC