W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-discuss@w3.org > May 2001

Re: Discussion of an app-layer API for IPsec

From: Eric Brunner-Williams <wampum@maine.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 22:29:15 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>, "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <phoffman@imc.org>, discuss@apps.ietf.org

>allow an application to see if it is running over

I was tempted to delete the last word. ptrace(2) comes to mind.

Seriously, I love API work, but we do very little of it (v6, ldap, and what 
The proposal is ipsec-specific, the problem is more general, and we've not had
a go at the more general problem in a decade (host requirements), having left
that in the POSIX, XPG and Redmond sets of hands.

What would interoperate? What two independent implementations would do
what when independently discovering that each is "running over <foo>", on
the same, or distinct, and possibly dissimilar and not necessarily 

(author, XPG/1, XPG/4.2, and sundry other inconsequential bits of nonsense)

At 5/4/01 09:40 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>--On 01-05-04 11.39 -0700 "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <phoffman@imc.org> wrote:
> > The discussion just started;
> > applications folks might want to join in.
>...and part from having you joining that discussion, I am as AD interested
>to know if you are interested in something like that?
>    paf
Received on Friday, 4 May 2001 22:33:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:08:12 UTC