RE: 3GPP-T-WG3 codecs

> Patrik Fältström a écrit :
> > 
> > At 14.39 -0500 00-12-07, Philipp Hoschka wrote:
> > >In general, I'm a bit confused about the request - why would the
> > >IETF have to comment on the minimal set of codecs in a format
> > >defined by another organisation ? This would make sense if the
> > >goal is to define a minimal set of codecs that need to be supported
> > >by MIME mail readers, but otherwise, I don't see the point - am
> > >I missing something ?
> > 
> > Because they want to have the same codecs in the other organization
> > as we define for use in the IETF I guess.
> 
> Sounds reasonable, but in which effort does the IETF define minimally
> required codecs for a format ? If such an effort exists, I guess we'd
> be interested to use the same codecs as well.
> 
In the VPIM WG we defined the baseline audio codec for voice mail system
interoperability.  It is G.726 for VPIM v2.  For IVM the choice is currently
MS-GSM but may be changed to G.711.

In the Fax WG, they defined the baseline image format.  It is TIFF-S for
simple mode.