- From: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 16:31:37 -0800
- To: Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>, discuss@apps.ietf.org, www-smil@w3.org
At 14.39 -0500 00-12-07, Philipp Hoschka wrote:
>In general, I'm a bit confused about the request - why would the
>IETF have to comment on the minimal set of codecs in a format
>defined by another organisation ? This would make sense if the
>goal is to define a minimal set of codecs that need to be supported
>by MIME mail readers, but otherwise, I don't see the point - am
>I missing something ?
Because they want to have the same codecs in the other organization
as we define for use in the IETF I guess.
paf
--
Received on Thursday, 7 December 2000 19:36:48 UTC