- From: Randall Gellens <randy@qualcomm.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:08:00 -0800
- To: Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@innosoft.com>, discuss@apps.ietf.org
At 9:31 AM -0800 1/28/99, Chris Newman wrote:
> I'm interested in feedback on the following BOF/WG idea. Do you think
> this is a good/bad idea? Any suggestions to improve the proposed charter?
> Anyone interested in being a document editor of either of the two
> proposed documents or interested in WG chair/co-chair position?
I think it would be a good idea. A quick read of the straw charter
shows it contains those things that I can think of off the top of my
head. I also think that, while this could be very useful effort, it
could also degenerate and thus needs a tight reign on scope. The
work should definitely be done in steps:
1. Identify common problems
2. Identify solutions used in various protocols
3. Analyze solutions: what elements worked, what didn't
4. Publish informational document
5. Identify core set of problems for new skeleton protocol
I'd be willing to be a document editor or chair/co-chair.
Received on Thursday, 28 January 1999 18:12:43 UTC