- From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
- Date: Tue, 07 Dec 1999 19:16:42 -0500
- To: "Josh Cohen (Exchange)" <joshco@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
- cc: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>, "Yaron Goland (Exchange)" <yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com>, "'Patrik Faltstrom'" <paf@swip.net>, Scott Lawrence <lawrence@agranat.com>, discuss@apps.ietf.org, "Peter Ford (Exchange)" <peterf@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
> I like this response. It sounds like a good thing to trial. > However, its still tough to take the stigma of experimental, > would be it possible to have the state called "standards-track > experimental"? well, you can go to poisson and see whether you can convince them :) but my guess is - no. if you want some IETF statement that the work will be standards-track (that is, that this is indicative of the direction that IETF will be taking) you need review from the wider community, and some assurance that you're not working at cross purposes with other groups. you have the option of asking for Last Call for Experimental, but this is as much work as asking for Proposed Standard. Keith
Received on Tuesday, 7 December 1999 19:27:38 UTC