W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-discuss@w3.org > December 1998

Re: new applications-area mailing lists

From: John Strassner <jstrassn@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 15:42:04 -0800
Message-ID: <004101be20a8$dde63a00$826c45ab@jstrassn-pc.cisco.com>
To: <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, "Keith Moore" <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Cc: <moore@cs.utk.edu>, <fred@cisco.com>

I will be happy to review drafts for you that are related to
directory, policy, and schema of any type. If I can ever free up more
time, then perhaps I can review some others as well.


-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
To: discuss@apps.ietf.org <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
Cc: moore@cs.utk.edu <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Date: Tuesday, December 01, 1998 6:32 PM
Subject: new applications-area mailing lists

>At the last IETF meeting several people offered to offload some of
>ADs' workload by reviewing draft specifications.  I've recently
>some mailing lists for use by people who volunteer to review drafts
>the following categories:
> for people willing to review messaging-related draft specifications
> (including email, netnews, fax, voice mail, mobile messaging)
> for people willing to review web-related draft specifications
> for people willing to review directory-related draft specifications
>Here's how I forsee these lists being used:
>When the Apps ADs need review of a draft specification in one of the
>categories, one of the ADs will post a message to the appropriate
>asking for volunteers to review that specification.  Those willing to
>review the spec should reply to the list.  The AD will then note who
>agreed to review the draft.  The reviews, when complete, can then be
>posted to the list (or if the reviewer prefers, sent directly to the
>Some reviews might prompt other people to look at those documents,
>so with luck documents that deserve additional review will get it.
>Offhand, I don't think these lists should be used for random
>of these topics.  Many people are too busy to read high-volume lists.
>I hope that by keeping the lists narrowly focused on document
>we can keep some of those busy (but valuable) people subscribed.
>General apps-area discussion should stay on discuss@apps.ietf.org.
>Thanks for your patience while I got this set up.
>I'm looking forward to having more reviewers.
Received on Saturday, 5 December 1998 18:42:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:08:05 UTC