Re: Merging of collections

Yes, that would be a reasonable optimization. 
Currently, that would require two round-trips ... one to retrieve the 
version with that label, and another to do the MERGE.

Cheers,
Geoff


Werner wrote on 11/20/2006 05:57:35 AM:
> RFC 3253 says that if the merge source identifies a VCR, the checked-in
> version of that VCR is the merge source. This doesn't seem to cover
> the classical case where a labeled version in one branch is merged into
> another branch. Allowing the Label header in the MERGE method could
> solve this. This way the request URI and the merge source could be the
> same VCR, where the version with the label is the merge source.