- From: Werner Donné <werner.donne@re.be>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:03:43 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
No, I'm not. It is just a remark about a defensive way to extend a content model. Regards, Werner. Julian Reschke wrote: > Werner Donné schrieb: >> Adding the error element to the response element is indeed >> nicer, but it would have been safer to add it after all >> "old" elements in the content model, as it was done for the >> location element. Current clients which don't ignore unknown >> elements that intervene in an existing content model different >> from "ANY", will break. It is likely that such clients simply >> consume the elements they know in the known order and then stop. > > Well, those clients are broken anyway. I don't see any point in adapting > to them. > > Are you aware of clients with that problem? > > Best regards, Julian > > -- Werner Donné -- Re Engelbeekstraat 8 B-3300 Tienen tel: (+32) 486 425803 e-mail: werner.donne@re.be
Received on Thursday, 10 August 2006 16:03:32 UTC