- From: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 08:44:24 -0400
- To: werner.donne@re.be
- Cc: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org, ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 13 July 2006 12:44:38 UTC
Yes, and note that a client can also just DELETE the target before requesting the COPY, in which case a fresh set of resources would be created at the destination (each with a new version history, if the server automatically puts new resources under version control). Cheers, Geof Werner wrote on 07/13/2006 05:53:37 AM: > > In other words, the position is taken that when a user > copies a collection to an existing destination, both are > likely to be related to the user. Otherwise strange > version histories would result for internal members that > happen to coincide. This position seems reasonable. > > There is a practical consequence for the user, however. > Since the operation is recursive, the user has to be aware > of the internal members that coincide at any depth and > make sure that either they are checked out or that their > "auto-version" property is set properly. It is also > necessary that all subcollections at the destination are > checked out or have the appropriate auto-version property.
Received on Thursday, 13 July 2006 12:44:38 UTC