- From: Werner Donné <werner.donne@re.be>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:27:33 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Indeed. The scenario I was referring to is described in section 10.4.10 of RFC 2616, the 409 status-code. Thank you. Regards, Werner. Julian Reschke wrote: > Werner Donné wrote: >>> Why not do it with the PUT response body? >> >> Because I don't think the PUT method is supposed to have a response >> body. RFC 2616 says nothing about a response body in section 9.6, >> while for methods that can have one it explains the conditions for >> it. >> >>> Best regards, Julian >> >> Regards, >> >> Werner. > > > Any method response can have a body, except for HEAD. > > Best regards, Julian > > -- Werner Donné -- Re Engelbeekstraat 8 B-3300 Tienen tel: (+32) 486 425803 e-mail: werner.donne@re.be
Received on Wednesday, 22 March 2006 12:26:44 UTC