- From: Sohn, Matthias <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:56:50 +0200
- To: "'Geoffrey M Clemm'" <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, "'ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org'" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Geoffrey M Clemm [mailto:geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Montag, 11. August 2003 19:46 > To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org; webdav > Subject: RE: DAV:displayname with versions > > > > Yes, 3253 leaves the definition of versioning behavior for > live properties > up to the standard that defines those live properties. > > > So we should probably try to define the versioning behavior for 2518 > properties > in 2518bis. In general, the simplest default versioning > behavior for a > property such as DAV:displayname is to treat it the same as a dead > property, > i.e. it is an immutable copy of the value of that property on > the VCR at > CHECKIN time. Does this work for folks currently doing versioning? > (I couldn't quite tell from Lisa's description whether this is > the Xythos behavior or not). Yes this is exactly the behavior of our server implementation > > Cheers, > Geoff > > Lisa wrote on 08/11/2003 01:09:58 PM: > > > > Sure, every version must have the displayname property so > you can get it > > with PROPFIND. However, no specification requires that to be either > > writable or protected on a version, so on some servers it won't be > writable. > > Also no specification requires it to be either static or > dynamic, so > it's > > possible on some servers that the property would be > protected, and it > would > > change whenever the value on the VCR changed. > > > > I believe on Xythos WFS the displayname property is > protected and static > on > > versions. It will always have the same value as the displayname > property of > > the VCR. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Geoffrey M Clemm > > > > > > There is no concept of a "global" property of a version. > > > Each version is a separate resource, with its own properties. > > > So each version has its own DAV:displayname property. > > > > > > But there is a natural place to put a "global" property of a > > > version, namely, as a property on the VersionHistory of > that version. > > > > Horst wrote on 08/11/2003 11:47:38 AM: > > > > > > > > Just a simple question, is the DAV:displayname of a > > > resource "global" > > > > ? Or is it possible to have different DAV:displayname(s) > > > for different > > > > versions of the same resource. >
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2003 01:58:22 UTC