- From: <Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:44:49 +0100 (MET)
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
- Cc: Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de
"Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de> wrote: > "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com> > > OK, since there are three folks asking for UN-XXX-CONTROL, > > I'm willing to withdraw my objection since I'm the only one > > objecting. > > > > So now the main question is: should this go in the > > next revision of 3253, or should it be a separate draft? > > (Either one is OK with me). > > I think it would be best to collect all "common" extensions to DeltaV into a > separate draft. Once it's stable and depending on the timeline for > RFC3253bis, we can decide either to move contents into RFC3253bis or to > publish it separately. Sounds fine to me. BTW, is there already an "common" extensions draft ? Then there would be a search for volunteers to do a draft for UNVERSION-CONTROL and UNBASELINE-CONTROL. Lisa, Julian, others or should I give it a try ? I couldn't promise to do it the next couple of days but it's not that urgent I guess. Cheers, Edgar -- edgar@edgarschwarz.de "http://www.edgarschwarz.de" "http://www.edgar-schwarz.de/forum/oberon" Running Active Oberon Make it as simple as possible, but not simpler. Albert Einstein
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 15:44:54 UTC