- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:48:42 +0100
- To: "Ietf-Dav-Versioning@W3. Org" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Hi, given two collections with version controlled members: - a with member VCRs m1 and m2 - b with member VCRs m2 and m3 What is the expected result for COPY a Destination-URI: b Overwrite: T ? (let's assume no auto-versioning for now) Based on RFC2518 only I would expect a collection b with members "m1" and "m2". However, RFC3253 clarifies that COPY/Overwrite updates (and doesn't replace), so I'd expect the following members of "b": - m1 (newly created, whether it's versioned or not depends on the automatic versioning behaviour of the server) - m2 (updated when m2 already was checked out, untouched when checked-in) - m3 (unchanged) Julian
Received on Monday, 18 March 2002 08:49:02 UTC