- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 23:42:26 +0100
- To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, "Ietf-Dav-Versioning@W3. Org" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
> From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org > [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:49 PM > To: Ietf-Dav-Versioning@W3. Org > Subject: RE: locate-by-history report vs. Depth header > > > Actually, the report clearly makes the most sense for depth=0 (perhaps > that's what you > meant to type?). You managed to confuse me :-) It the request URI is the parent collection, and the scope is the member of this collection, only depth = 1 seems to make sense. Depth 0's scope would be just the parent collection, correct?
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2002 17:42:44 UTC