- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 23:14:33 -0500
- To: "Ietf-Dav-Versioning@W3. Org" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
That is correct. It probably would be very reasonable to define both of these behaviors as being required in the next rev of the protocol. Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Roy Seto [mailto:Roy.Seto@oracle.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:46 PM To: Ietf-Dav-Versioning@W3. Org Subject: VERSION-CONTROL in an activity Suppose I wanted to capture that adding a resource to version control was part of an activity. It seems to me that this could be reflected by making the VERSION-CONTROL method create a VCR whose DAV:checked-in version included that activity in its DAV:activity-set property value. It looks like the spec allows but does not require servers to do this (for example) if the VERSION-CONTROL request includes a DAV:activity-set element, or if the request-URL for VERSION-CONTROL is the member of a workspace with a nonempty DAV:current-activity-set property value. Is this interpretation correct? Thanks, Roy
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2002 23:15:05 UTC