- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 18:53:43 -0500
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
It's up to the server, but I'd probably go with (3), as it probably
provides the most value.
Cheers,
Geoff
-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:52 PM
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: DAV:comment vs auto-versioning
Hi,
what's the best treatment for DAV:comment when a resource get's checked in
due to auto-versioning?
1) no special treatment (old value),
2) remote it (set it to empty string),
3) generate a server-specific comment ("checked in due to auto versioning
on...")?
Julian
Received on Saturday, 23 February 2002 18:54:15 UTC