RE: version-tree REPORT on non-version-controlled resource

OK,

this make sense.

The spec could be a bit clearer, though :-)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
> [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 6:43 PM
> To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
> Subject: RE: version-tree REPORT on non-version-controlled resource
> 
> 
> No, not "400:Conflict.
> 
> Either "409: Conflict" if the resource could be put under version control,
> or "403: Forbidden" if the resource cannot be put under version control.
> 
> Cheers,
> Geoff
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 11:30 AM
> To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
> Subject: DAV:version-tree REPORT on non-version-controlled resource
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> what would be the expected response code for a DAV:version-tree 
> report on a
> resource which is not version controlled? Bad Request?
> 
> Julian
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2002 12:47:39 UTC