RE: Issues/questions regarding sections 3, 4 and 5... from Clemm, Geoff on 2001-08-15 (ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org from July to September 2001)

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 14:47:10 -0400
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B1018E2587@SUS-MA1IT01>

   From: Tim Ellison [mailto:Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com]

   > Section 5.4.1 since this report is on a collection I would
   > like a Depth header defined.
   > Again I think we should be consistent (to avoid speical-case
   > coding). Any method that gets properties of a collection
   > should take a Depth header.

   All REPORTs may take a Depth: header (see versioning-16 Sec. 3.6)

Yes, but I think Peter's point was that the Depth header is
missing in the example.  It is in fact missing ... I've added
it.  Thanks for noticing!

Cheers,
Geoff

Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2001 14:41:14 UTC