- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 16:50:05 -0400
- To: DeltaV <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
From: Julian F. Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de] > From: Clemm, Geoff > > Probably, the best way to go is to replace the old syntax, i.e.: > > <D:supported-live-property-set> > <D:supported-live-property> > <D:name> <D:getcontentlanguage/> </D:name> > </D:supported-live-property> > <D:supported-live-property> > <D:name> <X:quota/> </D:name> > </supported-live-property-set> Why do we need <D:name>? Wouldn't <D:supported-live-property-set> <D:supported-live-property> <D:getcontentlanguage/> </D:supported-live-property> <D:supported-live-property> <X:quota/> </D:supported-live-property> </D:supported-live-property-set> This would make it unsafe to define extensions to the D:supported-live-property content, because you would risk colliding with the name of a live property. The D:name intermediate node ensures that there is no such collision. Cheers, Geoff
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2001 16:41:02 UTC