- From: John Hall <johnhall@evergo.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:40:46 -0700
- To: "'Jim Amsden'" <jamsden@us.ibm.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
They wouldn't. I don't think we should define that state. It is there because it mimic's the effect of The old auto-checkout-unlocked without an auto-checkin-unlocked. > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org > [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jim Amsden > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 5:06 PM > To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > Subject: RE: auto-checkout and auto-checkin > > > >> > > If the DAV:auto-version value is DAV:checkout, when a > modification request is applied to a checked-in > version-controlled resource, the request is automatically > preceded by a checkout operation. << How would a > non-versioning aware client check this back in? > > >
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2001 03:40:49 UTC