- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:44:34 -0400
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
From: Peter Raymond [mailto:Peter.Raymond@merant.com] In section 1.6.1 we have an example of a CHECKOUT method which fails with a DAV:must-not-be-checked-out and returning a 409 Conflict. I cannot actually see in the spec where the Precondition DAV:must-not-be-checked-out for the CHECKOUT method is defined? CHECKOUT has a DAV:must-be-checked-in Precondition NOT a DAV:must-not-be-checked-out Precondition. So is the example wrong or should the condition for CHECKOUT be changed. I also note that DAV:must-not-be-checked-out is used as a precondition for the LABEL method. Perhaps they should be consistent and both use DAV:must-not-be-checked-out? Thanks for catching that! When I renamed the precondition a while back, I neglected to update the example or the occurrences in the LABEL method. I'll fix that. Cheers, Geoff
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2001 14:37:24 UTC