- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:44:24 -0400
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
We use the standard meanings of 403 and 409 defined in RFC 2616 i.e.: 10.4.4 403 Forbidden The server understood the request, but is refusing to fulfill it. Authorization will not help and the request SHOULD NOT be repeated. 10.4.10 409 Conflict The request could not be completed due to a conflict with the current state of the resource. This code is only allowed in situations where it is expected that the user might be able to resolve the conflict and resubmit the request. But to make sure there is no misunderstanding, how about the following rewording of the first paragraph of section 1.6: A "precondition" of a method describes the state on the server that must be true for that method to be performed. A "postcondition" of a method describes the state on the server that must be true after that method has completed. If a method precondition or postcondition for a request is not satisfied, the response status of the request MUST be either 403 (Forbidden) if the request should not be repeated because it will always fail, or 409 (Conflict) if it is expected that the user might be able to resolve the conflict and resubmit the request. Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Lisa Dusseault [mailto:lisa@xythos.com] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 4:10 PM To: Peter Raymond; ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org Subject: RE: Postconditions with no XML elements defined? I had interpreted it as being 403 with precondition, 409 with postcondition, like you, but I agree it's not directly stated. Can the spec clarify please? lisa -----Original Message----- From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Peter Raymond Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 8:39 AM To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org Subject: Postconditions with no XML elements defined? Hi, In section 1.6 of the specification it states: In order to allow better client handling of 403 and 409 responses, a distinct XML element type is associated with each method precondition and postcondition of a request. But several Postconditions in the specification do not have any XML elements defined. Section 8.5, 8.6, 8.7, 8.8, and 9.6 for example. Do we need to change 1.6 to say that some preconditions and postconditions have distinct XML elements? Also regarding the 403/409 responses it was not clear from the spec when to send 403 and when to send 409. The text in section 1.6 reads: If a method precondition for a request is not satisfied, or if a method postcondition for a request cannot be achieved, the response status of the request MUST be 403 (Forbidden) or 409 (Conflict). Does this mean a 403 should be sent for a failed precondition and a 409 should be sent for a postcondition failure. Or does it mean the server implementer can return either code in either situation. This is not clear from reading the spec. Regards, -- Peter Raymond - MERANT Technical Architect (ADM) Tel: +44 (0)1727 813362 Fax: +44 (0)1727 869804 mailto:Peter.Raymond@merant.com WWW: http://www.merant.com
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2001 14:37:12 UTC