RE: A Tidied draft-16

I think it would make sense to use the RFC XML format instead :-)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
> [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Steinar Bang
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:32 AM
> To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
> Subject: Re: A Tidied draft-16
> 
> 
> >>>>> "Tim Ellison" <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>:
> 
> > As you are probably aware the ASCII renditioning is the official
> > format,
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > HTML and Word format are provided as a convenience for those who
> > prefer it.
> 
> Well, actually, on
> 	<http://www.webdav.org/deltav/>
> only links to HTML and Word versions of the draft are provided.
> 
> I looked for a link to a text version of draft-16, but couldn't find
> any.  Do you know where/if it can be found?
> 
> > p.s.  When I looked at the link you gave (in IE) the document
> > included damaged ascii-art pictures and double-spaced request and
> > response messages.
> > :-(
> 
> Hm... that's too bad.  I wonder if that's fixable with a suitable tidy
> parameter?  Hm... the ASCII art in
>   
> <http://www.webdav.org/deltav/protocol/draft-ietf-deltav-versionin
> g-16.htm>
> is broken in Opera, but shows up correctly in Netscape 4.72 on linux
> (which is actually pretty unusual...:-) )
> I'll try later, and publish the results.
> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 9 July 2001 05:34:53 UTC