Re: Revision 16 of the DeltaV spec is all advanced :-)

I agree :-)

Regards,
Tim

Peter Raymond <Peter.Raymond@merant.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if anyone else has already noticed, but in revision 16 of
the
> deltav document we
> have lost a crucial '1' from the last paragraph of the introduction
(section
> 1).
>
> In revision 16 it now reads:
>
> "An implementer that is only interested in basic versioning should
>  skip the advanced versioning sections (Section 0 to Section 15)."
>
> I think it should be 10 to 15.
>
> Maybe this was intentional, perhaps the whole spec is advanced :-)

Received on Monday, 9 July 2001 04:49:35 UTC