Sunday, 30 September 2001
- RE: Why does MERGE automatically checkin resources related to act ivities?
- RE: Clarification on subbaselines...
- Clarification on subbaselines...
Friday, 28 September 2001
- RE: Why does MERGE automatically checkin resources related to act ivities?
- Why does MERGE automatically checkin resources related to activit ies?
- RE: Legal operations on members of a Baseline Collection...
- RE: Legal operations on members of a Baseline Collection...
Thursday, 27 September 2001
- RE: Clarification of DAV:update-merge-set when rerunning MERGE
- RE: merge-preview Report, MERGE and UPDATE responses
- RE: Clarification on what exactly is captured in the Baseline Col lection...
- RE: Legal operations on members of a Baseline Collection...
- RE: Legal operations on members of a Baseline Collection...
- RE: Clarification on definition of a configuration....
- RE: Legal operations on members of a Baseline Collection...
- RE: Clarification on what exactly is captured in the Baseline Col lect ion...
- RE: Clarification on what exactly is captured in the Baseline Col lect ion...
- RE: Clarification on definition of a configuration....
- RE: Legal operations on members of a Baseline Collection...
- Re: Legal operations on members of a Baseline Collection...
- Re: Clarification on what exactly is captured in the Baseline Collect ion...
- DAV:merge-preview Report, MERGE and UPDATE responses
- RE: Clarification on definition of a configuration....
- RE: Legal operations on members of a Baseline Collection...
- Clarification on what exactly is captured in the Baseline Collect ion...
- Legal operations on members of a Baseline Collection...
- Clarification on definition of a configuration....
Wednesday, 26 September 2001
- RE: Any DeltaV clients out there?
- RE: Missing version number in diagram...
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-18.txt
- Missing version number in diagram...
Tuesday, 25 September 2001
Monday, 17 September 2001
Saturday, 15 September 2001
Friday, 14 September 2001
- Clarification of DAV:update-merge-set when rerunning MERGE
- RE: Various comments...
- Re: Powerpoint slides of Version Controlled Collections....
- RE: Various comments...
- RE: Various comments...
- RE: Various comments...
- RE: Powerpoint slides of Version Controlled Collections....
- Re: Powerpoint slides of Version Controlled Collections....
- Powerpoint slides of Version Controlled Collections....
- RE: Various comments...
Thursday, 13 September 2001
- RE: Editorial: DAV:ignore-preview or DAV:ignored-preview?
- RE: Various comments...
- RE: Various comments...
- Editorial: DAV:ignore-preview or DAV:ignored-preview?
- Various comments...
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-18.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-18.txt
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-18.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-18.txt
- RE: Locking
- Re: WebDAV Invalidation (Was Re: Allow: header and supported meth ods)
- RE: Global Properties
- RE: Any DeltaV clients out there?
- Any DeltaV clients out there?
Wednesday, 12 September 2001
Tuesday, 11 September 2001
- Call for Experts: JSR-147 (Workspace Versioning and Configuration Management)
- RE: Working Collections
- Re: Working Collections
Monday, 10 September 2001
- RE: Re (2): The Depth header...
- Re (2): The Depth header...
- RE: Working Collections
- Working Collections
- RE: The Depth header...
- RE: Some more comments on the LABEL section...
Sunday, 9 September 2001
Saturday, 8 September 2001
Friday, 7 September 2001
- RE: Feature request for CHECKIN/OUT extension
- Re: Feature request for CHECKIN/OUT extension
- RE: REPORTS
- Re: REPORTS
- RE: REPORTS
- RE: The Depth header...
- Event Notification BOF (Was RE: WebDAV Invalidation)
- RE: WebDAV Invalidation (Was Re: Allow: header and supported methods)
- RE: The Depth header...
- RE: WebDAV Invalidation (Was Re: Allow: header and supported methods)
- RE: The Depth header...
- Re: The Depth header...
- Re: The Depth header...
- Re: Some more comments on the LABEL section...
- RE: The Depth header...
- Minor editorial change to section 9.2...
- Re: The Depth header...
- Some more comments on the LABEL section...
- The Depth header...
- RE: REPORTS
- RE: WebDAV Invalidation (Was Re: Allow: header and supported methods)
Thursday, 6 September 2001
- RE: WebDAV Invalidation (Was Re: Allow: header and supported methods)
- RE: REPORTS
- RE: REPORTS
- RE: Cache-Control and the Vary header...
- Cache-Control and the Vary header...
- RE: REPORTS
- DAV:expand-property report (was RE: REPORTS)
- RE: REPORTS
- RE: REPORTS
Wednesday, 5 September 2001
- RE: REPORTS
- RE: REPORTS
- RE: REPORTS
- RE: REPORTS
- RE: REPORTS
- Re: REPORTS
- RE: client workspaces, merging and forking
- Re: No recommendation for how to make a resource unversioned
- RE: extending method request/response bodies
Tuesday, 4 September 2001
- extending method request/response bodies
- RE: No recommendation for how to make a resource unversioned
- RE: No recommendation for how to make a resource unversioned
- REPORTS
- RE: No recommendation for how to make a resource unversioned
- No recommendation for how to make a resource unversioned
- RE: Issues/questions regarding sections 3, 4 and 5...
- RE: client workspaces, merging and forking
- Re: client workspaces, merging and forking
- RE: client workspaces, merging and forking
Sunday, 2 September 2001
- DeltaV and ACL supported on Sharemation
- RE: WebDAV Invalidation (Was Re: Allow: header and supported methods)
Thursday, 30 August 2001
- RE: Changes to baseline section in draft 17...
- Re: WebDAV Invalidation (Was Re: Allow: header and supported methods)
Wednesday, 29 August 2001
Tuesday, 28 August 2001
Monday, 27 August 2001
Saturday, 25 August 2001
Friday, 24 August 2001
- RE: Last Call: Versioning Extensions to WebDAV to Proposed Standa rd
- RE: Last Call: Versioning Extensions to WebDAV to Proposed Standard
- deltav changes-and-issues
- RE: client workspaces, merging and forking
- Re: client workspaces, merging and forking
- RE: client workspaces, merging and forking
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-17.txt
- Re: client workspaces, merging and forking
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-17.txt
- client workspaces, merging and forking
Wednesday, 22 August 2001
- Re: WebDAV Invalidation (Was Re: Allow: header and supported methods)
- RE: Issues/questions regarding sections 3, 4 and 5...
- RE: Issues/questions regarding sections 3, 4 and 5...
Tuesday, 21 August 2001
- Re: MERGE & UPDATE responses
- RE: MERGE & UPDATE responses
- MERGE & UPDATE responses
- WebDAV Invalidation (Was Re: Allow: header and supported methods)
- RE: Versions being deleted during a MERGE...
- Re: Versions being deleted during a MERGE...
- Re: Allow: header and supported methods
Monday, 20 August 2001
- RE: Allow: header and supported methods
- RE: Versions being deleted during a MERGE...
- Re: Versions being deleted during a MERGE...
- Re: Versions being deleted during a MERGE...
- Re: Versions being deleted during a MERGE...
- Re: Versions being deleted during a MERGE...
- Re: Making resources unversioned
- Re: Why have separate DAV:checked-in and DAV:checked-out?
- Re: Versions being deleted during a MERGE...
- RE: Why have separate DAV:checked-in and DAV:checked-out?
- RE: Versions being deleted during a MERGE...
- Re: Allow: header and supported methods
Sunday, 19 August 2001
- Why have separate DAV:checked-in and DAV:checked-out?
- Versions being deleted during a MERGE...
- Re: Diagram showing the effect of baseline-control...
- RE: Making resources unversioned
Saturday, 18 August 2001
Thursday, 16 August 2001
Wednesday, 15 August 2001
- RE: label encoding
- RE: IETF-51 DeltaV WG meeting minutes
- RE: Comments regarding locking & auto-checkin...
- RE: List of areas in the specification where properties are empty /not set
- RE: Diagram showing the effect of baseline-control...
- RE: Issues/questions regarding sections 3, 4 and 5...
- RE: Issues/questions regarding sections 3, 4 and 5...
- label encoding
- Re: Allow: header and supported methods
- RE: Allow: header and supported methods
- Versioning without versions?
- RE: Allow: header and supported methods
- RE: New name for variant of DAV:auto-version
- RE: Allow: header and supported methods
Tuesday, 14 August 2001
- RE: Allow: header and supported methods
- RE: Allow: header and supported methods
- RE: Use of attributes
- RE: Checked out vs checked-in
- Behavior of PUT on unlocked resource with invalid IF header ...
- RE: Use of attributes
- Checked out vs checked-in
- Re: Allow: header and supported methods
- RE: IETF-51 DeltaV WG meeting minutes
- Re: Allow: header and supported methods
- IETF-51 DeltaV WG meeting minutes
- Allow: header and supported methods
Monday, 13 August 2001
- Re: Comments regarding locking & auto-checkin...
- RE: Comments regarding locking & auto-checkin...
- RE: Comments on locking and auto-checkin...
- Re: Issues/questions regarding sections 3, 4 and 5...
Sunday, 12 August 2001
Friday, 10 August 2001
- RE: Feature request for CHECKIN/OUT extension
- RE: Problems with locking and DeltaV resources
- RE: Feature request for CHECKIN/OUT extension
Thursday, 9 August 2001
- RE: A different perspective on versioning cf DeltaV
- RE: Use of attributes
- RE: Feature request for CHECKIN/OUT extension
- RE: Feature request for CHECKIN/OUT extension
- RE: Comments regarding locking & auto-checkin...
- RE: Feature request for CHECKIN/OUT extension
- webdav interoperability event: slide presentation
Tuesday, 7 August 2001
Thursday, 9 August 2001
Tuesday, 7 August 2001
Thursday, 9 August 2001
Tuesday, 7 August 2001
Wednesday, 8 August 2001
Tuesday, 7 August 2001
- Comments regarding locking & auto-checkin...
- RE: Feature request for CHECKIN/OUT extension
- RE: Feature request for CHECKIN/OUT extension
Wednesday, 8 August 2001
Monday, 6 August 2001
- RE: auto-checkout and auto-checkin
- RE: Feature request for CHECKIN/OUT extension
- RE: Feature request for CHECKIN/OUT extension
- RE: Use of attributes
- DeltaV breakout session
- RE: How Clients find out if they can perform a checkout
- RE: Use of attributes
- RE: Use of attributes
- RE: Use of attributes
- Feature request for CHECKIN/OUT extension
- RE: auto-checkout and auto-checkin
- DeltaV breakout session at IETF 51
- Re: Appendix A -- Resource Classification
- RE: Use of attributes
- RE: Use of attributes
Sunday, 5 August 2001
Saturday, 4 August 2001
Friday, 3 August 2001
- RE: How Clients find out if they can perform a checkout
- Fixing wording mistake in my example.
- RE: How Clients find out if they can perform a checkout
- RE: How Clients find out if they can perform a checkout
- RE: How Clients find out if they can perform a checkout
- RE: How Clients find out if they can perform a checkout
- RE: How Clients find out if they can perform a checkout
- RE: How Clients find out if they can perform a checkout
- RE: Supported-live-property-set
- RE: Appendix A -- Resource Classification
Thursday, 2 August 2001
- Supported-live-property-set
- Appendix A -- Resource Classification
- RE: IETF '51 and WebDAV
- IETF '51 and WebDAV
- IETF 51 and DeltaV Breakout Sessions
Friday, 27 July 2001
Tuesday, 24 July 2001
Tuesday, 17 July 2001
Wednesday, 25 July 2001
Tuesday, 24 July 2001
- RE: How Clients find out if they can perform a checkout
- RE: How Clients find out if they can perform a checkout
- RE: How Clients find out if they can perform a checkout
Monday, 23 July 2001
Tuesday, 17 July 2001
- RE: auto-checkout and auto-checkin
- RE: auto-checkout and auto-checkin
- RE: auto-checkout and auto-checkin
- RE: auto-checkout and auto-checkin
Monday, 16 July 2001
- RE: auto-checkout and auto-checkin
- RE: auto-checkout and auto-checkin
- RE: auto-checkout and auto-checkin
- RE: auto-checkout and auto-checkin
- RE: ... By the way ...
Saturday, 14 July 2001
- RE: Modified: Auto update of VCR when checking an associated work ing resource
- RE: Quick Question: Determine support of IN-PLACE CHECKOUT.
- RE: Modified: Auto update of VCR when checking an associated work ing resource
Friday, 13 July 2001
- ... By the way ...
- RE: auto-checkout and auto-checkin
- Modified: Auto update of VCR when checking an associated working resource
- Quick Question: Determine support of IN-PLACE CHECKOUT.
- Auto Update
- RE: Auto update of VCR when checking an associated working resource
- Semantics of supported-*
- RE: Auto update of VCR when checking an associated working resource
- RE: Auto update of VCR when checking an associated working resource
Thursday, 12 July 2001
- RE: Auto update of VCR when checking an associated working resource
- RE: Manual checkout, automatic checkin?
- RE: Auto update of VCR when checking an associated working resource
- RE: UNCHECKOUT after automatic checkout?
- RE: Auto update of VCR when checking an associated working resource
- Auto update of VCR when checking an associated working resource
- RE: Versioning and Lock Null resources
- Re: Question: after the current state
- RE: Postconditions with no XML elements defined?
- RE: auto-checkout and auto-checkin
- RE: Postconditions with no XML elements defined?
- RE: auto-checkout and auto-checkin
- Manual checkout, automatic checkin?
- RE: UNCHECKOUT after automatic checkout?
- RE: auto-checkout and auto-checkin
- Re: Question: after the current state
Monday, 9 July 2001
Thursday, 12 July 2001
- RE: Postconditions with no XML elements defined?
- RE: Finding the version of a resource in a Version-Controlled-Col lect ion...
- RE: Postconditions with no XML elements defined?
- RE: auto-checkout and auto-checkin
- Re: auto-checkout and auto-checkin
- Re: UNCHECKOUT after automatic checkout?
- Re: Finding the version of a resource in a Version-Controlled-Collect ion...
- Re: Finding the version of a resource in a Version-Controlled-Collect ion...
- RE: auto-checkout and auto-checkin
- auto-checkout and auto-checkin
- UNCHECKOUT after automatic checkout?
- Versioning and Lock Null resources
Wednesday, 11 July 2001
- RE: Label behaviour...
- RE: Postconditions with no XML elements defined?
- RE: The definition of a "Baseline-Controlled Collection"
- RE: The definition of a "Baseline-Controlled Collection"
- RE: Label behaviour...
- RE: Should it be DAV:must-not-be-checked-out or DAV:must-be-check ed-i n?
- RE: Finding the version of a resource in a Version-Controlled-Col lect ion...
- RE: Label behaviour...
- RE: The definition of a "Baseline-Controlled Collection"
- RE: Postconditions with no XML elements defined?
- RE: Postconditions with no XML elements defined?
- RE: Revision 16 of the DeltaV spec is all advanced :-)
- RE: The definition of a "Baseline-Controlled Collection"
- RE: Expiration date on draft 16?
- RE: Postconditions with no XML elements defined?
- RE: Postconditions with no XML elements defined?
- RE: Postconditions with no XML elements defined?
- Re: Postconditions with no XML elements defined?
- RE: Label behaviour...
- Re: The definition of a "Baseline-Controlled Collection"
- Re: Label behaviour...
- Re: Should it be DAV:must-not-be-checked-out or DAV:must-be-checked-i n?
- Re: Finding the version of a resource in a Version-Controlled-Collect ion...
- Re: Finding the version of a resource in a Version-Controlled-Collect ion...
Tuesday, 10 July 2001
- Re: Finding the version of a resource in a Version-Controlled-Collect ion...
- RE: Label behaviour...
- Re: The definition of a "Baseline-Controlled Collection"
- RE: Label behaviour...
- Re: Label behaviour...
- Re: Should it be DAV:must-not-be-checked-out or DAV:must-be-checked-i n?
- Should it be DAV:must-not-be-checked-out or DAV:must-be-checked-i n?
- Label behaviour...
- Finding the version of a resource in a Version-Controlled-Collect ion...
- Re: A Tidied draft-16
Monday, 9 July 2001
- RE: Postconditions with no XML elements defined?
- Postconditions with no XML elements defined?
- The definition of a "Baseline-Controlled Collection"
- Re: Expiration date on draft 16?
- Expiration date on draft 16?
- Missing reference in section 8...
- RE: A Tidied draft-16
- Re: A Tidied draft-16
- Re: Revision 16 of the DeltaV spec is all advanced :-)
- Revision 16 of the DeltaV spec is all advanced :-)
- Re: A Tidied draft-16
- A Tidied draft-16
Friday, 6 July 2001
Thursday, 5 July 2001
- RE: Bindings to non versioned controlled resources in version con trolled collections
- RE: Bindings to non versioned controlled resources in version con trolled collections
- Bindings to non versioned controlled resources in version controlled collections
- RE: Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something
- RE: Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something
- RE: Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something
- RE: Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something
- RE: Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something
- Re: Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something
- RE: Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something
- Re: Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something
- RE: Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something
- Re: Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something
Wednesday, 4 July 2001
- RE: Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something
- RE: Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something
Tuesday, 3 July 2001
- draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-16 now available
- RE: Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something
- Re: Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something
- RE: Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something
- RE: Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something
Monday, 2 July 2001
- Re: Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something
- Re: Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something
- Clarifying subbaseline MERGE and UPDATE semantics
- RE: Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something
- Version-controlled collection resources - I am still missing something