- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 12:56:57 -0800
- To: "Geoffrey M. Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Can somebody clarify what this would mean: > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org On Behalf Of Geoffrey M. > Clemm > Subject: comments on deltav-10.5 from Yaron Goland, Act Two > > These are the comments that I think may be more controversial. > ... > (II.6) Require that a version URL never be re-used after a version is > deleted. Whether or not I agree with this, I find the phrase "version URL" to be ambiguous enough that I'm not certain what this comment is supposed to mean, so I'll start with an example: - foo.doc is created - foo.doc is made versioned and "foo.doc.__v1__" is defined as the relative version URL - All of foo.doc is deleted - foo.doc is created - foo.doc is made versioned, NOW, according to this suggestion, the current version CANNOT be called foo.doc.__v1__ therefore is called foo.doc.__v2__ Is that the intent? if so, I'd have to disagree with this; although it might be desirable for a server to avoid ever having a version URL re-used, it ought not to be part of the standard. I don't actually think it's relative to the standard, although it may be very relative to good server design. lisa
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2000 15:57:19 UTC